Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9483 (BOM)

SUMANBAI @ RUKHMANBAI KACHARU JADHAV AND OTHERS v. RAUF BAIG ISMALI BAIG AND OTHERS

CA/3316/2025 · 2025-03-28

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} CA 3316.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3316 OF 2025 IN A.O. NO. 2 OF 2024 Sumanbai @ Rukhmanbai Kachru Jadhav and another through their GPA Holder Virendra Surendra Bankar Versus Rauf Baig s/o. Ismail Baig and others. … Smt. H.N. Jadhav, Advocate for applicants Mr. S.V. Natu, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 28TH MARCH, 2025. P.C. :- 1. Heard Ms. Jadhav, learned advocate for the applicant. Present application is filed seeking to condone delay of 49 days caused in filing the review application. 2. Perused the application and reasons stated therein. According to applicant, due to poverty she could not arrange for necessary expenses for filing review. As such, delay has been occurred, which is unintentional. Further, applicant has filed a Medical Certificate showing that she had suffered injury due to fall and advised rest. 3. Considering the aforesaid facts, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Hence, application is allowed. Delay is condoned. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J] grt/- 2025:BHC-AUG:9861