RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/31676/2025 · 2025-09-17
Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94827 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31676 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State-respondent and Shri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent - Kanpur Development Authority (KDA).
2. Shri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent - KDA has placed a detailed instructions, which is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the said instructions, states that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed at this stage, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if so required.
4. With the aforesaid leave, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
September 18, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C., Shiv Prakash Gupta (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Rakesh Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad