M/S I F F D C KRISHAK SEVA KENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WTAX/4632/2025 · 2025-09-16
Piyush Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94818 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94818 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 4632 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. After arguing at some length, when a pointed query was put to learned counsel for the petitioner that in which para the findings recorded against the petitioner has been assailed, he refers para -9, which itself merely narration of facts. Confronted with the said fact, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Certified copy of the impugned order, if any, may be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining its photostat copy. September 17, 2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Kumar Rastogi, Vishakha Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Piyush Agrawal,J.) M/S I F F D C Krishak Seva Kendra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad