CRWP-9271-2025 1 112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9271-2025 Date of decision: 27.08.2025 MANJEET SINGH AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Gobind Singh Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA , J (Oral): 1. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to take appropriate action against respondents No.4 to 7 who are harassing and threatening the petitioners and their family by interfering in their peaceful life and liberty. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the police is unnecessarily harassing the petitioners by frequently visiting their house. 3. On advance notice, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G. Punjab, submitted that the nephew of the petitioners has committed offences under Sections 363 and 366 of IPC and to locate the minor girl the police visited the house of the petitioners and later on when the petitioners came to the police station with respectable members, they gave an undertaking that they will extend help for searching that girl. He further submitted that MONIKA RANI petitioners are not required in that case and there is no threat perception. 2025.08.29 13:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9271-2025 2 5. Heard. 6. Disposed of. If petitioners still have any grievance, they can exhaust their remedy as available to them as per law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 27.08.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.08.29 13:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document