IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 LPA-2474-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 26.08.2025 NEHA SHARMA . .Appellant Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI PRESENT: Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sandeep Chabra, Additional A.G, Haryana. Mr. Fateh Saini, Caveator/respondents. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the appellant has challenged the order of suspension dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P-6), passed by ld. Deputy Commissioner, but as the appellant wants that the enquiry proceedings initiated against her to be completed in a time bound manner, hence, the appellant will be satisfied at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to conclude the enquiry proceedings in a time bound manner so that the appellant does not suffer indefinite prejudice due to suspension already ordered against her vide order dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P-6). 2. Learned State counsel submits that the enquiry proceedings initiated against the appellant will be concluded by the authorities concerned within the period of three months from today by following due process as envisaged under law and by also giving due opportunity of hearing to the RIYA 2025.08.28 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-2474-2025 (O&M) -2- appellant to project her case that the allegations alleged against her are incorrect. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that keeping in view the above, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) JUDGE 26.08.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.08.28 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document