Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:6544 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS 2215/2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy AG, for the State.
Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate, for the caveator.
(2) Petitioner moved an application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, alleging that the defendants to the suit have violated the
order of temporary injunction, passed by the Trial Court. Learned Trial Court, vide order dated 11.7.2025,
directed for issuance of notice. Petitioner has challenged the said
order in this writ petition.
(3) Law is well settled that no lis can be decided without hearing the other side. Petitioner has alleged disobedience of order of temporary injunction, passed by the Trial Court, therefore Trial Court was justified in calling explanation from the other side. Thus we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned
order. Writ petition thus fails and is dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
24.7.2025 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aea b198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052D F6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.07.24 14:45:44 +05'30'
2025:UHC:6544