Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94761 (ALL)

DARAKHSHAN AZIZ v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/13795/2025 · 2025-09-14

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13795 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2,4 and 5 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to pay post retiral dues as gratuity with suitable rate of interest, in favour of the petitioner as well as further payer to direct the respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.08.2025 in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representation. However, despite representation moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief as prayed for, however, in case petitioner move fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4; District Basic Education Officer, Ka within three weeks Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhiranjan Singh Patel, Sheo Kinkar Singh, Suryaprakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harsh Vardhan Gupta Darakhshan Aziz .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 15, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 13795 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad