Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9476 (UTT)

JAGROOP SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1862/2020 · 2025-06-27

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1862 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Avneesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is contended by counsel for the State, on instructions, that after investigation a charge sheet dated 15.07.2020 has been submitted in favour of the petitioner, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement made by counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the writ petition. 5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 27.06.2025 SK