Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94758 (ALL)

NAVIN TOMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/20294/2025 · 2025-09-09

Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20294 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondent and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that vide an order dated 6.4.2024, respondent No.2 has approved the history-sheet against the petitioner. He has further submitted that against the said approval of the history-sheet, petitioner has preferred a representation dated 21.04.2025 before the respondent No.2 which is still pending consideration and no order till date has been passed by the respondent-authority. 3. Learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view thereof, respondent No.2 is directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 21.4.2025 preferably, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. September 10, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar, Avadh Pratap Singh Shishodia Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Navin Tomar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad