Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94741 (ALL)

VINOD PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WPIL/2905/2025 · 2025-09-18

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2905 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents for taking cognizance under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against one Rahul Sweets and Restaurant. 2. A perusal of the record indicates that already proceedings are pending against the said Rahul Sweets and Restaurant, as reflected from the report of the Lekhpal (Annexure-3). 3. Filing of a petition, only for the sake of publicity without even looking at the document which the petitioner himself has annexed with the petition, cannot be countenanced. The petition is therefore, dismissed. September 19, 2025 AHA/AKShukla Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Chandra Pandey, Keshawa Prasad Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jagdish Pathak (S.C.) (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Vinod Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AFZAL HUSAIN ABBASI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad