RAJU v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER GORAKHPUR MANDAL, GORAKHPUR AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/32384/2025 · 2025-09-15
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94740 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32384 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner Gorakhpur Mandal, Gorakhpur (Respondent no.1) to decide the Appeal No. C. 20240500001223 (Uma Shankar Versus Raju and others) District Deoria within a short period."
2. It is contended that against the order passed under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, an appeal has been preferred, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the said appeal.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent no. 1 to decide Appeal No. C-20240500001223 (Uma Shankar Vs. Raju and others), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Raju .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Gorakhpur Mandal, Gorakhpur And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 16, 2025 Shekhar WRIC No. 32384 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad