HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11051 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue an order or direction in an appropriate nature directing the Court to decide the temporary injunction application exhibited as Paper No.6-C filed in the Original Suit No.66 of 2025 (Reeta Devi Vs. Bindu Devi and another) pending in the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.1, Saidpur, Ghazipur finally on day to day basis within stipulated period of time." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.1, Saidpur, Ghazipur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramashray Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Reeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) Bindu Devi And Another .....Respondent(s) of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 16, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11051 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad