HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31949 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 & 2 and learned counsel for respondent no.3. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been handed over the plot in respect of which, he has been granted lease on 08.07.2022. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Maharajganj, District Maharajganj within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law after hearing all the necessary parties within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 15, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhat Kumar Singh, Rajat Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar Tiwari, C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Jagdish .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad