Raushan Kumar Nirala @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Nirala Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./4725/2025 · 2025-02-25
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9473 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9473 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4725 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2024 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Raushan Kumar Nirala @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Nirala Kumar S/o Chandrika Prasad R/o-Village-Pakri, P.S.-Karai Parsurai, District-Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 329(4), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, on 10.11.2024 at about 7 AM, this petitioner, along with other accused persons named in the F.I.R., armed with lathi, danda and rod, forcibly entered into house of informant and abused and assaulted him. It is further alleged that when family members of informant came to rescue her, they were also assaulted by stick and threatened.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, a dispute took place
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4725 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 between the parties over installation of bamboo which led to a simple maar-peet in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner are simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Karai Parsurai P.S. Case No. 198 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S..
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T