Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94707 (ALL)

VIBHA RANI SRIVASTAVA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/33011/2025 · 2025-09-18

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33011 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Abhishek Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.2 & 3. 2. The petitioners by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "A- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to get the house no. D39/15 area 365 square feet =33.92 square meter situated in mauja Kodai Chauki (New Road) Ward Dashashvamegh Tahsil Sadar, District Varanasi be recorded in the name of petitioners in Nagar Nigam Varanasi. B-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 and 3 to decide the application dated 13.6 2025 forthwith or within stipulated period. C-Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. D-Award cost of the petition to be paid in favour of the petitioners." 3. Sri Abhishek Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for respondents Nagar Nigam states that now the manual applications are not entertained, and the petitioners have to submit online application for mutation of their names. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anup Kumar Pandey, Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Kumar Yadav, C.S.C., Vineet Sankalp Vibha Rani Srivastava And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh online application to the respondents Nagar Nigam for mutation of his name. In case, any such application is filed, the respondents Nagar Nigam shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law after issuing notice to all the concerned stake holders in the property within a period of two months from the date of submission of the application. September 19, 2025 NS WRIC No. 33011 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad