IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CWP-27414-2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2025 CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Versus CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have decided to make the payment to respondent No.1 and the present petition may kindly be disposed of having not been pressed any further, but the question of law whether an ineligible person should be allowed the benefit as granted by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh, vide order dated 18.12.2024, may kindly be kept open. 2. As the petitioners have already decided to implement the said order passed by the Tribunal dated 18.12.2024, the present petition is disposed of having not been pressed any further, keeping the question of law open. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) September 16, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.17 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment