SANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9278/2025 · 2025-08-27
Subhas Mehla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94663 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94663 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-9278-2025 1 114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9278-2025 Date of decision: 27.08.2025 SANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Ms. Jasneet, Advocate for Ms. Jainika Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA
, J (Oral):
1. The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ to official respondents No.2 and 3 for protecting life and liberty of petitioners, from the hands of private respondent Nos.4 to 8 and not to harass them in any manner.
2. In this regard, this Court has already given the directions in Asha and another vs. State of Haryana and another, CWP No.6717 of 2009, decided on 25.07.2012 and in compliance of the same, the State Government had taken steps to protect the life and liberty of run away couple.
3. Apart from that the State of Punjab vide notification dated 23.01.2025 also notified the SOPs for the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners in similar situations, in compliance of the Criminal Writ Petition No.12562 of 2023 titled as “Kajal Vs. State of Haryana and MONIKA RANI 2025.08.28 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-9278-2025 2 others”.
4. In the light of the above directions, the petitioners are directed to approach the concerned authorities.
5.
Disposed of.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 27.08.2025 monika
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No
2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.08.28 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document