Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94657 (PAT)

Jugal Kishore Prasad @ Jugal Prasad Sonar @ Jugal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/23113/2018 · 2025-11-18

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23113 of 2018 ====================================================== Jugal Kishore Prasad @ Jugal Prasad Sonar @ Jugal Prasad son of Late Laxmi Ram @ Laxmi Gold Smith resident of Mohalla- Magarwa Pipal Shanti Bat Briksh Station Road, Siwan, P.S.- Siwan Sadar, District -Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Siwan. 3. The Additional Collector, Siwan. 4. The Anchaladhikari, Siwan Sadar, Siwan. 5. Braj Kishore Yadav through Power of Attorney Holder of Putul Devi, Son of Yamuna Prasad, resident of Gudri Hatha, P.S.- Siswan, District-Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Dhurjati Kumar Prasad- Gp-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 18-11-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to take steps for cancellation of Jamabandi created wrongly in the name of Leela Kamakar on the basis of khatiyan which is doubtful and fraudulent vide Jamabandi No. 19534 with respect to the land of Tauzi No. 1474, Khata No. 1348, Survey No. 2656, Patna High Court CWJC No.23113 of 2018(2) dt.18-11-2025 2/2 area 16 Kattha 13 dhur, Thana No. 231 situated of Nirala Nagar Siwan as it was maintained / standing in the name of father of the petitioner namely Laxmi Ram Sonar. Further direct the respondents to maintain in the name of the petitioner as it was causing as Jamabandi No. 377 in the name of petitioner's father; (iii) and for any other relief/s for which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. A counter affidavit has come on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 4 duly signed by the C.O., Siwan, Sadar according to which the petitioner ought to have moved before the Additional Collector, Siwan under section 13 of the Mutation Act. 4. In that background, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent no.3, the Additional Collector, Siwan, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U