AJAY JOSHI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/20477/2025 · 2025-09-11
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Vivek Kumar Birla
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94657 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94657 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20477 of 2025 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard Sri Rajan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Ms. Divya Ojha, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 28.7.2025, registered as Case Crime No. 0399 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 131, 115(2), 117(2), 351(2) and 110 BNS, PS Jahangirabad, District Bulandshahar, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.
3. Although the prayer for quashing of FIR has been made, but without insisting on the same, only submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment upto seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 BNSS. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017 Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2017 and in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCC 51 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mani Tiwari, Rajan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ajay Joshi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. We have gone through the impugned first information report and without interfering in the same, we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgement are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in terms of the judgements as noted above. September 12, 2025 Abhishek CRLP No. 20477 of 2025 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Vivek Kumar Birla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad