ABDUL HAMID DAR v. STATE (NOW UT) OF J AND K AND ORS. (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION)
RP/86/2024 · 2025-02-07
Puneet Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9463 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9463 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 2 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR RP 86/2024 In WP(C) 1627/2022 Abdul Hamid Dar … Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate
Vs. State of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ilyas Laway, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA, JUDGE
ORDER 07.02.2025
01. This is a petition filed by the petitioner seeking review of the
order dated 13th November, 2024, passed by this Court in WP(C) 1627/2022, whereby this Court while admitting the writ petition filed by the petitioner has provided by way of an interim arrangement that the post against which respondent No. 6 has been selected shall be filled up in accordance with law, however, one post as may be available as on date or that which would fall vacant in future, shall be reserved.
02.
Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the aforesaid order came to be passed on the basis of the statement made by
learned counsel for the respondent No. 6 that he was selected against the post with which the petitioner had no grievance. Mr. Shafqat Nazir,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 6 figures in the wait list and is not a selected candidate.
03. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the interim order is clear and unequivocal and provides that the post against which the respondent No. 6 has been selected is required to be filled up in accordance with law, meaning thereby if the respondent No. 6 is not selected, no post is required to be filled up in accordance with law. The
impugned order was clear enough, yet the petitioner has chosen to file a review petition to allay his wild apprehensions. The review petition is without any merit and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(PUNEET GUPTA) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 07.02.2025
“Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 10.02.25