HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34807 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and Sri Anurag Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2. 2. This petition has been filed by the applicants for quashing the summoning order dated 19.6.2018 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Room No.4/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Bareilly as well as entire proceedings of Special Criminal Case No.64 of 2021 (State Vs. Chota @ Naheem) arising out of Case crime No.43/2018, under Sections- 363, 366, 376 IPC and 4 of POCSO Act, police station Bhuta, District Bareilly pending in the court of Special Judge (POCSO Act) II, Bareilly. 3. The compromise affidavit filed today is taken on record. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably compromised their dispute, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7. Original copy of compromise, if filed before this Court along with the present Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anurag Pandey, G.A. Chota @ Naheem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) application, be returned to the learned counsel for applicants, as per Rules of Court. 8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 RKM. NA528 No. 34807 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad