HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32257 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition challenging the order dated 21.06.2025 by which the application submitted by the petitioner for appointment as fair price shop dealer under dying in harness Rules was rejected. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has remedy to prefer an appeal against the aforesaid order. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the appellate authority. 5. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority. In the event any such appeal is filed by petitioner within one month from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the appellate authority after affording opportunity of hearing to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sarvesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) the parties within a period of one month without giving any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties. 6. Needless to say that any appointment made during the pendency of the appeal will be subject matter of the decision taken in the appeal. September 16, 2025 saqlain WRIC No. 32257 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad