HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13866 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the District Basic Education Officer, Prayagraj, on the basis of oral information, informs that the details of few petitioners given in the writ petition, are incorrect. Therefore, the respondent BSA is not in a position to look into their grievance. An objection has also been raised regarding the affidavit being sworn by the petitioner no. 1, wherein few averments made in the writ petition have been sworn on the basis of personal knowledge. On the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with correct and better averments in the affidavit. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. September 16, 2025 DS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamal Kumar Kesherwani Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Santosh Kumar Singh And 107 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad