Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35066 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and Sri Arjun Kumar Gautam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2.
2. This petition has been filed by the applicants for quashing the entire proceedings of Sessions Trial No.256 of 2022( State Vs. Krishna Kumar Gupta and three others) arising out of case crime No.192 of 2021, under Sections- 366, 376 of IPC, police station Ghughuli, District Maharajganj pending before Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Maharajganj.
3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably compromised their dispute, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties.
4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below.
5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. Original copy of compromise, if filed before this Court along with the present application, be returned to the learned counsel for applicants, as per Rules of Court.
8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Awaneesha Kumar, Mahesh Kumar Sahani, Narendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Arjun Kumar Gautam, G.A. (Alok Mathur,J.) Krishna Kumar Gupta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad