MOHD. KALEEM AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), PRAYAGRAJ DIVISION PRAYAGRAJ AND 15 OTHERS
WRIC/2006/2025 · 2025-01-22
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9459 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2006 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Kaleem And Another Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division Prayagraj And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aprajit Yadav,Shyam Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Azad Rai,C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
3. The basic relief sought by the petitioners in the present petition is to direct the respondent no. 1 to decide the Case No. 1893 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. C202402000001893) "Mohd. Kaleem and Another Vs. Manzoor Husain and Others", under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously.
4. The matter is pending before the Court below since 2024 and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is
disposed of directing the Respondent no. 1/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad