Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2239 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2024 Thana- Mathurapur District- Samastipur ====================================================== Kanchan Devi W/o Pramod Mahto R/o Village- Jhilli Chauk, Mathurapur, P.S.- Mathurapur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, 3 liters country made liquor was recovered from the house of petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and she is no way connected with the aforesaid recovery. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that 3 liters illicit liquor was recovered from the house of petitioner. He further submits that this application for grant of anticipatory bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2239 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 2/2 to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T