Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9456 (GAU)

DEBEN DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/1562/2023 · 2025-01-28

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010058312023 2025:GAU-AS:1002 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1562/2023 DEBEN DEKA S/O- LATE SOPOK KEOT, VILL- KAMARPARA, P.O. AND P.S. MANGALDAI, DIST.- DARRANG (ASSAM), PIN- 784125 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DARRANG AT MANGALDAI P.O. AND P.S. MANGALDAI DIST.- DARRANG (ASSAM) PIN- 784125 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER MANGALDAI REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND P.S. MANGALDAI DIST.- DARRANG (ASSAM) PIN- 784125 4:AS PER HON'BLE ORDER DTD. 14.08.2024 IN IA (C) 146/2024 RESPONDENT NO. 4 IS STRUCK DOWN NATIONAL HIGH-WAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA REP. BY THE PROJECT DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL HIGH WAY NO.-15 4TH FLOOR NEDFI HOUSE G.S.ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM- 781036 5:THE MINISTRY OF SHIPING ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGH WAY GOVT. OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA SHASTRI BHAWAN NEW DELHI- 110001 6:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY PWD BUILDING AND NH DISPUR GUWAHATI- Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M HUSSAIN, MD A WADUD Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. D NATH (R-6),MR. K GOGOI (R-5),SC, NHAI,SC, REVENUE BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R 29.01.2025 Heard Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no.1 and Mr. S. Baruah, learned State Counsel for the respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 and Ms. S. Baruah, learned State Counsel for the respondent no.5. Ms. S. Baruah, learned State Counsel submits that the compensation have already been disbursed to the petitioner. Having considered that the compensation has already been disbursed to the petitioner, I am of the view that no issue remains to be determined in this proceedings. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant