Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9452 (KAR)

MANIKANT RATHOD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/200793/2025 · 2025-06-03

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2809 CRL.P No. 200793 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200793 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MANIKANT RATHOD S/O NARENDRA RATHOD, AGE:28 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.1-1-85, STATION ROAD, NEAR THASIL OFFICE, CHITTAPUR, KALABURAGI, NOW AT. B. G. 6, BHARAT PRIDE PARK, OPP. LAHOTI MOTORS, GUNJ AREA, KALABURAGI-585101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SANDEEP SHIVARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH CHOWK POLICE STATION, KALABURAGI CITY, NOW REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585 103. 2. SRI RAJIV JANE S/O PARAMESHWAR JANE, AGE:37 YEARS, OCC: SOCIAL WORK, R/O. H.NO.349, CIB COLONY, KALABURAGI-585 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP FOR R1) Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2809 CRL.P No. 200793 of 2025 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS-2023, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO.113/2023 OF CHOWK POLICE STATION KALABURAGI FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 469, 505(1)(B) OF INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KALABURAGI, IN CRIME NO.113/2023, IN SO FAR AS ACCUSED NO.1 (AS PER FIR) IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) 1. Case called twice. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. The very same petitioner has filed another Criminal Petition No.201129/2023 and already there is an interim order in the said petition. 4. The prayer in the said petition and the prayer made in the present petition are practically one and the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2809 CRL.P No. 200793 of 2025 same and therefore, this second petition for the same prayer is not permissible. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed, as not maintainable. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13 CT:PK