Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9451 (UTT)

KRIPAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1746/2021 · 2025-03-03

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1746 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Anamika Basiwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter on 11.04.2022 which is not disputed by the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 03.03.2025 SK