Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94504 (PNJ)

RAHUL KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/9268/2025 · 2025-08-28

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-9268-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Rahul Kumar State of Punjab CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Present : Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Advocate and Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that restricts her prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4 to finally dispose of the petitioner before the jail authorities, parole as the same has been pending decision 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the of the petitioner of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. 5. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. August 28, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : 2025 (O&M) Sr. No.102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9268 Date of Decision : Versus and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Advocate and Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate, or the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4 to finally dispose of the representation dated 11.08.2025 submitted on before the jail authorities, Central Jail, Hoshiarpur parole as the same has been pending decision. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.4 to take a final decision on the representation dated 11.08.2025 the petitioner for the grant of parole within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE August 28, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 9268-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.08.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI A.G., Punjab. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.4 to finally representation dated 11.08.2025 submitted on behalf of the Central Jail, Hoshiarpur, Punjab for grant of Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No.4 to 11.08.2025 submitted on behalf for the grant of parole within two weeks from the date of receipt All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.08.29 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document