Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9450 (RAJ)

CHANDRA PRAKASH @ CHANDU S/O BHERULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/301/2025 · 2025-03-04

Inderjeet Singh, Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 301/2025 Chandra Prakash @ Chandu S/o Bherulal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 241, Peer Baba Pipalda, Police Station Pipalda, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail Kota) Through His Father Bherulal, S/o Shri Bajrang Lal, Aged About 71 Years, R/o 241, Peer Baba Pipalda, Police Station Pipalda, District Kota (Raj.) 325004. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Prisoners Parole Advisory Committee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan. 3. Superintendent Central Jail, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Additional Government Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 04/03/2025 The present parole petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction of this Court to the authority below for early disposal of the permanent parole application filed by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that on earlier occasions, the petitioner had been granted first regular parole as well as emergent parole and after completion of the period of said (2 of 2) [CRLW-301/2025] paroles, he had timely surrendered before the concerned authority and never misused the liberty of the parole granted to him. Counsel further submits that the application of the petitioner seeking permanent parole is pending before the authority below for sufficient long time and prayed that the authority below be directed to decide the said application of the petitioner expeditiously. Learned Additional Government Advocate has no objection so far as the direction for early disposal of the permanent parole application of the petitioner is concerned. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, we direct the authority below to decide of the permanent parole application of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is received in their office. The petition is accordingly allowed in the above terms. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/29