[2025:RJ-JP:9673] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3199/2025 Amru S/o Chunna, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Ladlaka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Singhal For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rohit Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.336/2024 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341, 354, 379, 452, 504 & 506 of IPC. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341, 452, 307, 504 & 506 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that other co-accused persons namely Salim & Mausam Ali @ Mausam have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 16.01.2025. Petitioner is in custody since 16.02.2025 and trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:9673] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3199/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. They submit that petitioner is duly named in the FIR. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that other co-accused persons namely Salim & Mausam Ali @ Mausam have been granted benefit of bail by this Court; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Amru S/o Chunna shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /65