Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9449 (GAU)

JAGAT SING TERON v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/1908/2024 · 2025-05-01

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010058112024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1908/2024 JAGAT SING TERON S/O- LATE CHANDRA SING TERON, R/O- VILL.- DIPHU TOWN, P.O. AND P.S. DIPHU, MOUZA- JAMUNAPAR, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN- 782460. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HILL AREAS, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY KARBI ANGLONG PIN- 782460 DIPHU ASSAM 3:THE REVENUE OFFICER REVENUE DEPARTMENT KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL KARBI ANGLONG DIPHU ASSAM-782460. 4:THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER DIPHU REVENUE CIRCLE KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL KARBI ANGLONG DIPHU ASSAM- 782460. Page No.# 2/3 5:THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR LAND ACQUISITION CUM JOINT SECRETARY (REVENUE) DEPARTMENT KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM PIN- 782460. 6:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY (ESTT AND LA) NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS R. NO. 103 TRANSPORT BHAVAN 1 PARLIAMENT STREET NEW DELHI-1. 7:THE PROJECT MANAGER MONITORING UNIT DIPHU NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD PWD (IB)PWD COLONY LUMDING ROAD DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG PIN- 782460 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B P BORAH, J DASGUPTA,MR P J DUTTA,A KHANDAKAR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, NHIDC,SC, K A A C,SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 02.05.2025 Mr. B. P. Borah, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, on instructions submits that the petitioner does not desire to continue with the present writ petition. Accordingly, he prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ Page No.# 3/3 petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant