Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13540 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to grant joining to the petitioner on the post of Assistant Clerk in the institution namely Kasturba Inter College, Firozabad pursuant to the promotion order dated 05.08.2024 by issuance of formal order to the same effect at the earliest in accordance with law. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to release the salary and arrears of salary to the petitioner w.e.f. date of joining of the petitioner on his post of Assistant Clerk in the institution concerned i.e. 06.08.2024 at the earliest in accordance with law. iii. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 07.07.2025 within stipulated period of time as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Shukla, Ram Prakash Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pravesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within ten days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, District Inspector of Schools, Firozabad is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) September 10, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 13540 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad