Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9447 (JHR)

AYUSH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3655/2025 · 2025-05-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:13935 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3655 of 2025 ------ Ayush Kumar aged about 21 years, son of Jawahar Lal Poddar @ Javahar Poddar, resident of village-Barauni, P.O. & P.S.-Teghda, District-Begusarai, Bihar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.112 of 2024 arising out of Koderma P.S. Case No.141 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed the murder of Nasim Eraki and Md. Anjar Alam @ Rajan who were the staff in hotel of the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that there is specific allegation against the co-accused Dilkhush Kumar, that he fired upon the deceased persons, due to which they died. It is next submitted that charge has not yet been framed. It is then submitted that except the case of recovery of revolver, in connection with this case, the petitioner has not been involved in any other case. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.06.2024 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Koderma in connection with S.T. Case No.112 of 2024 arising out of Koderma P.S. Case No.141 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/