SUPINDER SINGH @ SUPINDER SINGH KANG v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/57652/2023 · 2025-08-11
Amarjot Bhatti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94459 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94459 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
206
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-57652-2023
Date of Decision:- 11.08.2025
SUPINDER SINGH @ SUPINDER SINGH KANG ....Petitioner
Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present:- Mr. A.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Manjot Kaur, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Satnam Singh, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.2.
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
After arguing some time learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw present petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.171 dated 17.10.2022, Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar Rural under Sections 406, 498-A of IPC (Annexure P-5) along with Look Out Circular under Section 105 B of Cr.P.C. on account of the fact that power of attorney as well as affidavit annexed with the petition do not have apostille certificate. Therefore, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with complete correct particulars on removing the said defect.
In view of the aforesaid statement, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well.
(AMARJOT BHATTI) (AMARJOT BHATTI) (AMARJOT BHATTI) (AMARJOT BHATTI)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE 11.08.2025
Snd Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No. Whether reportable
: Yes/No
SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.08.13 18:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document