Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31571 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Ms. Ishita Sand holding brief of Mrs. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (in short "GNIDA").
2. The petitioner herein claims allotment of 120 sq. meters developed abadi land in lieu of her acquired land bearing Khasra No.3 area 0.0536 hect. i.e. 536 Sq. Mtrs. of the Revenue Village Sirsa, Pargana & Tehsil Dadri, Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for GNIDA has vehemently opposed the writ petition and submitted that the relief, as has been prayed for, is not amenable under the Scheme in question.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that the issue raised herein would require a factual enquiry. Without entering into the merits of the case, we direct that the petitioner shall file a fresh representation before the respondent authority within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order and the respondent authority is under obligation to take an expeditious decision by passing a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a further period of six weeks. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Pal, Monika Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. Roshan Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. September 10, 2025 SP/ WRIC No. 31571 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad