MANISH BHARDWAJ AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/31637/2025 · 2025-09-10
Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31637 of 2025 Court No. - 29 (Sl.No.45) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Mrs. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (in short "GNIDA").
2. The petitioners herein claim allotment of 120 sq. meters developed abadi land out of their acquired land in Khasra No.809 of Village Tusyana, Pargana and Tehsil-Dadri, District- Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for GNIDA has vehemently opposed the writ petition and submitted that the relief, as has been prayed for, is not amenable under the Scheme in question.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find that the issue raised herein would require a factual enquiry. Without entering into the merits of the case, we direct that the petitioner shall file a fresh representation before the respondent authority within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order and the respondent authority is under obligation to take an expeditious decision by passing a reasoned and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Golu Kumar Mishra, Monika Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. Manish Bhardwaj And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
speaking order strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a further period of six weeks.
5. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) September 11, 2025 Ashish Pd.
WRIC No. 31637 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad