IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 250 of 2024 ------ 1. Chaitanya Swarup Gupta, aged about 51 years, son of Rameshwar Sao, 2. Bimla Devi, aged about 67 years, wife of Rajeev Rameshwar Sao 3. Aman Sao @ Bunty @ Aman Kumar, s/o Balram Sahu, aged about 33 years, resident of Village-Chund, P.S.- Mandar, P.O.-Brambe, Dist.-Ranchi … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Triloki Munda, son of Sukar Munda, resident of Village- Adra, P.O. & P.S.-Thakurgaon, Dist.-Ranchi 3. Crime Investigation Department, having office at P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi. … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate : Ms. Sonal Sodhani, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, AG : Mr. Sreenu Garapati, SC III For the Respondents : Mr. Rahul Kumar Mishra, Advocate : Mr. Abhishek K. Gupta, Advocate : Ms. Neha Agarwal, Advocate ------ Order No.11 Dated- 15.01.2025 I.A. No.10214 of 2024 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for amendment/correction of the order dated 29.07.2024 in which it has inadvertently been mentioned that “the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Thakurgaon P.S. Case No. 38 of 2023 was instituted pursuant to the order passed by the learned court under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.” but the same is not a correct statement as in fact, Thakurgaon P.S. Case No. 38 of 2023 has been registered on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant of the case namely Emen Toppo directly in the police station concerned, without intervention of any court. The learned GA III submits that in fact, Thakurgaon P.S. Case No. 38 of 2023 has been registered basing upon the written report submitted by the informant Emen Toppo and no complaint case was filed by Emen Toppo nor there was any rhyme or reason for any court to pass any order under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. In view of the admitted fact, it be treated that Thakurgaon P.S. Case No. 38 of 2023 was instituted on the basis of the written report submitted by the informant Emen Toppo, directly in the police station. This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) W.P. (Cr.) No. 250 of 2024 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet filed by C.I.D. in C.I.D. P.S. Case No. 22 of 2024. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The interim order granted earlier vide order dated 29.07.2024 is vacated. Registry is directed to intimate the court concerned forthwith. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/