Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9440 (RAJ)

SMT SUPRIYA AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/16295/2010 · 2025-02-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16295/2010 1. Smt Supriya D/o Bhagwana Ram, Wife of Rajpal Singh, aged about 30 years, Resident of Village & Post Ojtu Tehsil Chirawa, district Jhunjhunu at present Working as ANM at Malion Ki Dhani, Rol, Nagaur. (Rajasthan) 2. Smt. Indra D/o Shishu Pal Singh W/o Sumer Singh aged about 31 years, resident of Dorasar, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) at Present Working as ANM at S.H.C. Sheshma Ka Bass, C.H.C. Kuchamancity, Distt. Nagaur. 3. Anita W/o Prakash Chand, aged about 30 years, resident of Mored, Tehsil Makrana, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.) at Present Posted as A.N.M. at Sub Health Centre, Mored Distt. Nagaur. 4. Sharda Dheva D/o Prabhati Lal Dheva W/o Surendra Kumar, aged about 31 years, resident of Village Sewa Ka Bas Post Jalasar Tehsil Fatehpur Distt. Sikar (Rajasthan) at Present Working as ANM at Sub. Health Centre, Naradhana PHC Rota Distt. Nagaur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, through Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Medical & Health, Government Secretariat, jaipur. 2. The Director, Medical & Health Services, Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical and Health Officer, (CM&HO) Distt. Nagaur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Verma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/02/2025 (2 of 2) [CW-16295/2010] 1. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made by the petitioners for issuing directions to the respondents to not to compel them to submit fresh bond. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the State respondents apprised this Court that during pendency of this petition, regular appointment has already been granted to the petitioners vide order dated 05.01.2016, hence, under the changed circumstances, no further cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with this petition and by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 3. Considering the above, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/109