Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94344 (ALL)

RAM RAKSHA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13546/2025 · 2025-09-09

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13546 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that despite judgment of this Court dated 23rd February, 2021 passed in Writ A No. 3093 of 2021, petitioner had not been paid arrears of salary regarding some dearness allowance. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner, though post retirement dues have been paid to the petitioner. It is further contended that in the above regard, petitioner has already moved an application on 4th March, 2025 before the competent authority, namely, respondent no. 4, which is still pending consideration. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event direction is issued to the concerned respondent to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in a time bound period. In view of aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of with direction to respondent no. 4 to look into and consider the claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period of two months from the date presentation of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. September 10, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Ram Raksha Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad