CRP No. 3925 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP No. 3925 of 2025 Gurusamy, ..Petitioner(s) Vs Devi @ Sangeetha ..Respondent(s) This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 20.01.2025 made in I.A.No.04 of 2023 in F.C.O.P.No.199 of 2023 on the file of the Family Court, Erode. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Ramaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Munusamy ORDER This Civil Revision Petition (CRP) has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the Family Court, Erode, in I.A.No.04 of 2023 in FCOP No.199 of 2023, dated 20.01.2025. 2. In the aforesaid order, the Family Court has directed the petitioner/husband to pay Rs.15,000/- to the respondent/wife, and Rs.7,500/- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3925 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 each to his two children as interim maintenance. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is supporting his children separately towards their educational expenses. But, however, as seen from the impugned order, the petitioner has not filed any documentary evidence in support of the said submission. On the other hand, the Family court has taken into consideration the expenditure incurred by the respondent/wife towards her children, born out of the wedlock with the petitioner/husband. 4. The petitioner is a resident of Canada, and as seen from the impugned order, he is earning Rs.3,46,827/- p.m. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is earning Rs.2 lakhs per month, there was no evidence placed on record by the petitioner before the Family Court to support the said stand. 5. This Court, after giving due consideration to the fact that the petitioner is well employed in Canada and is earning a substantial sum of money as his monthly income, is of the considered view that the sum of Rs.30,000/- payable by the petitioner to the respondent/wife and his two children towards interim maintenance cannot be found to be unreasonable, and the Family Court after analysing the evidence placed on record by the respective parties has come to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3925 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 the right conclusion. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds no infirmity in the impugned order, and accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No Costs. CMP.No.20601 of 2025 is closed. 05-08-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM To Family Court, Erode. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 3925 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. RKM CRP No. 3925 of 2025 05-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis