IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CRM-M-48441-2025 Date of decision : 04.09.2025 JAGJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Ms. Asha Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. The contents of present petition show that as per allegations of the petitioners, the petitioner No.1 suffered injuries in an incident of fighting, and that with respect to the same incident police have lodged FIR against the petitioner at the instance of opposite party i.e. complainant. As per petitioner although a DDR has been registered by the police but no action is being taken against the opposite party. 2. The remedy for the redressal of above mentioned grievance lies in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, where the petitioner can move a complaint for taking cognizance, against the opposite party. VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.05 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-48441-2025 2 3. In such circumstances no cause for survival of present petition exists. Hence, the present petition is hereby dismissed, accordingly. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 04.09.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.05 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order