Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:7234-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB/331/2019 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1 & 4.
3. Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 & 3.
4. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate for respondent nos. 5 & 6.
5. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 5 & 6 makes a statement at the bar that the reliefs, as claimed in the petition do not survive, as the selection process concluded in 2019 and the candidates recommended by the selection committee have been appointed as Lecturer, B.Ed.
6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Siddhartha Singh, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashish Naithani, .J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.)
18.08.2025 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a 131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56 D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.08.19 10:59:31 +05'30'