IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (264) RSA No. 5497 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.04.2025 Geeta Sharma …Appellant Versus Kailash Sharma (since deceased) through his LR Sanjiv Kumar …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. B.S.Sudan, Advocate for the appellant. None for respondents and applicants in CM-4382-C of 2023. **** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant has unfortunately expired and despite repeated efforts no one has come forward to be impleaded as legal representative of the appellant. 2. That being so, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to move an appropriate application for revival of the appeal in case the legal representatives of the appellant are interested in pursuing the same. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE April 22, 2025 Rekha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REKHA SHARMA 2025.04.24 02:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh