Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 94310 (PAT)

Deepak kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./68469/2025 · 2025-09-23

R P Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68469 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-351 Year-2025 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Deepak kumar Son of Shambhu paswan Resident of Village - Barwat, P.S. - Muffasil Bettiah, Dist. - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 23-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 351 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 111(3), 317(2), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the police apprehended the petitioner along with other co-accused person on a motorcycle and on demand of paper, they failed to provide any valid document for the motorcycle. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68469 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of stolen motorcycle. It is further submitted that the petitioner was only a passerby of that way and was arrested on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 351 of 2025. Rajorshi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T