Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9430 (JHR)

SANDHYA CHAKRABORTY And ORS v. NILANJANA CHAKRABORTY

WPC/3732/2008 · 2025-03-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI SA No. 286 of 2007 1. Sandhya Chkaraborty 2. Roma Chakraborty. both daughter of Late Bina Chkaraborty 3. Pradeep Kumar Chakraborty, son of Late Bina Chakraborty and Lalit Kumar Chakraborty, All resident of B.B. C. Road, Giridih Town, PO, P.S. & Distt.- Giridih, at present residing at Kolkata. All represented through Power of Attorney -Holder Mohin Vikas Roy, Son of Girja Kumar Roy, resident of New Barganda, P.O., P.S. and Distt. Giridih. … Plaintiffs/ Appellants /Appellants. Versus 1. Deleted 2. Nilanjana Chakraborty, D/o Late Pulin Bihari Chakraborty. Resident of B.B.C Road, P.O, PS and District-. Giridih … Defendants/Respondents/ Respondents With W.P. (C) No. 3732 of 2008 1. Sandhya Chakraborty 2. Roma Chakraborty. both daughter of Late Bina Chkaraborty 3. Pradeep Kumar Chakraborty, son of Late Bina Chakraborty and Lalit Kumar Chakraborty, All resident of B.B. C. Road, Giridih Town, PO, P.S. & Distt.- Giridih, at present residing at Kolkata. All represented through Power of Attorney -Holder Mohin Vikas Roy, Son of Girja Kumar Roy, resident of New Barganda, P.O., P.S. and Distt. Giridih. … Petitioners / Respondents /Plaintiffs Versus Nilanjana Chakraborty, D/o Late Pulin Bihari Chakraborty. Resident of B.B.C Road, P.O, PS and District-. Giridih … Respondents/ Appellant/Defendants Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : None For the Respondent : Mr. Prabhas Kumar , Adv. Mr. Ganesh Ram , Adv. Mr. Manish Sharma , Adv. 19 / 07.03.2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respondents but no one turns up on behalf of the appellants in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in SA No. 286 of 2007 and W.P. (C) No. 3732 of 2008 hence the appellants are not diligently pursuing the appeal. Accordingly, this SA No. 286 of 2007 is dismissed for default of the appellants and W.P. (C) No. 3732 of 2008 is dismissed for non-prosecution. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-