SANDHYA CHAKRABORTY And ORS v. NILANJANA CHAKRABORTY
WPC/3732/2008 · 2025-03-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9430 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9430 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SA No. 286 of 2007
1. Sandhya Chkaraborty
2. Roma Chakraborty. both daughter of Late Bina Chkaraborty
3. Pradeep Kumar Chakraborty, son of Late Bina Chakraborty and Lalit Kumar Chakraborty, All resident of B.B. C. Road, Giridih Town, PO, P.S. & Distt.- Giridih, at present residing at Kolkata. All represented through Power of Attorney -Holder Mohin Vikas Roy, Son of Girja Kumar Roy, resident of New Barganda, P.O., P.S. and Distt. Giridih. … Plaintiffs/ Appellants /Appellants.
Versus
1. Deleted
2. Nilanjana Chakraborty, D/o Late Pulin Bihari Chakraborty. Resident of B.B.C Road, P.O, PS and District-. Giridih
… Defendants/Respondents/ Respondents
With W.P. (C) No. 3732 of 2008
1. Sandhya Chakraborty
2. Roma Chakraborty. both daughter of Late Bina Chkaraborty
3. Pradeep Kumar Chakraborty, son of Late Bina Chakraborty and Lalit Kumar Chakraborty, All resident of B.B. C. Road, Giridih Town, PO, P.S. & Distt.- Giridih, at present residing at Kolkata. All represented through Power of Attorney -Holder Mohin Vikas Roy, Son of Girja Kumar Roy, resident of New Barganda, P.O., P.S. and Distt. Giridih. … Petitioners / Respondents /Plaintiffs
Versus
Nilanjana Chakraborty, D/o Late Pulin Bihari Chakraborty. Resident of B.B.C Road, P.O, PS and District-. Giridih
… Respondents/ Appellant/Defendants
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : None For the Respondent : Mr. Prabhas Kumar , Adv. Mr. Ganesh Ram , Adv. Mr. Manish Sharma , Adv.
19 / 07.03.2025
Heard the learned counsel for the respondents but no one turns up on behalf of the appellants in spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in SA No. 286 of 2007 and W.P. (C) No. 3732 of 2008 hence the appellants are not diligently pursuing the appeal.
Accordingly, this SA No. 286 of 2007 is dismissed for default of the appellants and W.P. (C) No. 3732 of 2008 is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-