Ganga Prasad Singh v. The U C O Bank Through Its Branch Head Fateha Branch and Ors
CWJC/7670/2017 · 2025-04-22
Smt G Anupama Chakravarthy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94286 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 94286 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7670 of 2017 ====================================================== Ganga Prasad Singh ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The U C O Bank Through Its Branch Head Fateha Branch and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Bank : Mr.Shivendra Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms.Sheela Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 5 22-04-2025
1. No representation for the petitioner.
2. Upon verification, the Learned counsel for the respondent clarified that the Mahindra & Mahindra Bolero vehicle was not sold in the year 2020; rather, it was sold on 12.06.2017.
3. In spite of posting the matter as a last indulgence, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution.
vinita/- (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) U