AMIT JAIN SON OF SHRI SATVEER SINGH JAIN v. DISTRICT JUDGE, JAIPUR CITY
CW/16240/2010 · 2025-02-13
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9427 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9427 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6418] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16240/2010 Amit Jain Son Of Shri Satveer Singh Jain, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of A-129, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur. 2. Sudarshan Singh (Died) Son Of Late Shri Mahtab Singh Jain, Resident Of C-43, Vasundhara Marg, Shyam Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur Through Legal Heirs- 2/1. Smt. Shashi Jain, Wife Of Shri Sudarshan Singh 2/2. Shri Rishabh Son Of Shri Sudarshan Singh, Resident Of C- 43, Shanti Path, Shyam Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur-
302019. 2/3. Sharad Son Of Shri Sudarshan Singh, Resident Of C-43, Vasundhara Marg, Shyam Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. 2/4. Shri Singh Ritul Jain Son Of Shri Sudarshan Singh, Resident Of C-43, Vasundhara Marg, Shyam Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. 2/5. Shri Punit Son Of Shri Sudarshan Singh, Resident Of C- 43, Vasundhara Marg, Shyam Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. 2/6. Smt. Preeti Jain Wife Of Shri Yogesh Jain, Resident Of C- 43, Vasundhara Marg, Shyam Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. 3. Sukhbeer Singh (Died) Son Of Late Shri Mehtab Singh Jain, Resident Of 4355, Film Drive, North,usa Through Power Of Attorney R.k. Sanghi, 4A, Ringh Road, Kilokari, New Delhi. 3/1. Smt. Nilima Jain D/o Late Shri Sukhveer Singh Jain Wife Of Shri Anil Jain, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of 501, Maruti Complex, Dadabhai Chananbany Lane, Parel, Mumbai- 400012 3/2. Smt. Sangeeta Jain D/o Late Shri Sukhveer Singh Jain Wife Of Shri Pradeep Jain, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ahinsa Kuteer, Goregaon (West), Mumbai. 3/3. Smt. Vandana Jain D/o Late Shri Sukhveer Singh Jain Wife Of Shri Sanjay Jain, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of D-67, Preet Vihar, Delhi- 92. [2025:RJ-JP:6418] (2 of 3) [CW-16240/2010] 3/4. Shri Sandeep Jain Son Of Late Shri Sukhveer Singh Jain, Aged About 33 Years, C/o Jaipur Motors, 1645, S.p. Mukharjee Marg, Near Novelty Cinema, Delhi, Resident Of 7/3. B.d. Estate, Teemarpur, Delhi. 4. Balveer Singh Son Of Late Shri Mehtab Singh Jain, Resident Of 4355, Film Drive, North, Usa Through Power Of Attorney R.k. Sanghi, 4A, Ring Road, Kilokari, New Delhi. 5. Satbeer Singh Jain Son Of Late Shri Mehtab Singh Jain, Resident Of Jaipur Motors, M.i.road, Jaipur (Died During Pendency Of The Writ Petition) Through His Legal Heirs. 5/1.
Smt. Jagrani Jain Wife Of Late Shri Satbeer Singh Jain, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of A-129, Shiv Marg, Shyam Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. 5/2. Smt. Seema Basotia Wife Of Shri Shrawan Basotia, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Nawalgarh House, Old Post Office Building, Opp. Lane Of Triton Mall Jhotwara Road, Jaipur 302012. 5/3. Smt. Poonam Lakhotia Wife Of Shri Pankaj Lakhotia, Aged About 45 Years, Resident A-60, Ram Marg, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. 6. Sushil Kumar Son Of Late Shri Mehtab Singh Jain, Resident Of M/s Meghdoot Sales, 3226/6, Bholaram Market, Delhi- 6. 7. Smt. Sitara Devi D/o Late Shri Mehtab Singh, Resident Of 32/143, Shipra Path, By Jain, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 8. Smt. Anand Kumar D/o Late Shri Mhetab Singh Jain Wife Of Late Shri Lala Padamchand Jain, Resident Of 28/27, Punjabi Bag Extension, Delhi. 9. Smt. Santosh Jain D/o Late Shri Mehtab Singh Jain Wife Of Shri Ramesh Chandra Jain, Resident Of 4140, Argyapura, Sabji Mandi, Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiven Agarwal for Mr. Alok Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhinav Kamwar Mr. Vaibhav Nirmal
[2025:RJ-JP:6418] (3 of 3) [CW-16240/2010] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order 13/02/2025 By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the
order dated 15.11.2010 passed by District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur in probate application No. 128/01, whereby the application filed by the respondents for consolidation of the application with suit No. 484/1993 has been allowed. Heard. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly in view of the fact that the suit was filed in the year 1993 and therefrom about 31 years have been passed, instead of interfering with the impugned order, I dispose of the present civil writ petition with a direction to the trial Court to decide the suit, if pending with it, expeditiously, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir/153