CMP(MD)Nos.15873, 15874 & 15876 of 2025 in WA(MD)SR.No.80183, 80185 & 80184 of 2025 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. These petitions have been filed seeking to condone the delay of 251 days each in filing the Writ Appeals against the orders of the learned Single Judge in W.P(MD)Nos.26981 to 26983 of 2024. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, it is stated that a review had been filed and thereafter these appeals have been filed. In view of the pendency of the review petition, there has been a delay in filing these appeals. 3.Notice had been directed and notice was served. The learned counsels entered appearance for the respondents and we have heard the learned counsels for the respondents also. 4. It had been stated in the counter that due diligence should have been shown in filing of the appeals. But however, we would take a broader view that the rights of the parties should be examined in the appeal stage. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. bala 5.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and these petitions are allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeals if the paper are otherwise in order. When the matter is listed for admission, the name of the learned counsels, who appeared for the respondents, shall be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J) bala 13.08.2026 CMP(MD)Nos.15873, 15874 & 15876 of 2025 in WA(MD)SR.Nos.80183, 80185 & 80184 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis